Thursday, October 2, 2025

Top 5 This Week

Related Posts

Nikki Glaser’s Diddy Joke at the Golden Globes Sparks Outrage Among CBS Viewers

The Golden Globe Awards, a night dedicated to celebrating the best in film and television, often serves as a platform for humor, satire, and sometimes, controversy. This year, comedian Nikki Glaser took the stage as the host, and while her opening monologue aimed to entertain, it quickly veered into contentious territory. Among her jokes, one particular quip about Sean “Diddy” Combs sparked outrage among viewers and attendees alike, highlighting the fine line between comedy and insensitivity.

Glaser kicked off her monologue with a playful jab at the star-studded audience, acknowledging their fame and talent. “I am not here to roast you tonight, and how could I? You are all so famous, so talented, so powerful,” she began, setting a lighthearted tone. However, the mood shifted as she introduced her first controversial joke, referencing the titles of nominated films like “Wicked,” “Queer,” and “Nightbitch.” Her punchline, “These are not just words Ben Affleck yells after he orgasms,” elicited laughter, but it was her subsequent comments that drew ire.

In a bold move, Glaser brought up the ongoing legal troubles of Diddy, who is currently facing serious allegations including sex trafficking and racketeering. As the mogul awaits trial, Glaser’s decision to weave his scandal into her routine raised eyebrows. She made a pointed reference to Diddy’s alleged “freak offs,” a term that has surfaced in lawsuits against him, including a high-profile $30 million suit filed by his ex-girlfriend Cassie Ventura. The lawsuit details disturbing claims of drug and alcohol-fueled parties where Diddy allegedly directed sexual encounters involving male escorts.

Glaser’s quip, “That movie was more sexually charged than Diddy’s credit card,” aimed to draw a laugh but instead landed flat. The audience’s reaction was muted, a stark contrast to the laughter she had received earlier. Her attempt to lighten the mood with a follow-up about Stanley Tucci—“A Stanley Tucci freak-off doesn’t have the same ring to it”—only seemed to amplify the discomfort in the room. The mention of “no baby oil this year — just lots of olive oil” was met with cringes rather than chuckles, particularly from Tucci himself.

The backlash was swift and vocal on social media. Users took to platforms like X (formerly Twitter) to express their disapproval. Comments ranged from disbelief to outright condemnation, with one user questioning the appropriateness of making jokes about Diddy at such a prestigious event. “Um……. not the Diddy jokes? At the Golden Globes???” one user wrote, while another remarked, “The Diddy jokes are unnecessary.” The general consensus among viewers was that Glaser’s humor crossed a line, especially given the serious nature of the allegations against Diddy.

This incident raises important questions about the role of comedy in addressing sensitive topics. While humor can serve as a coping mechanism or a way to shed light on serious issues, it can also backfire, particularly when the subject matter involves real victims and ongoing legal battles. Glaser’s choice to include Diddy’s scandal in her routine may have been an attempt to engage with current events, but it ultimately left many feeling uncomfortable and disillusioned.

As the Golden Globes continue to evolve, so too does the landscape of comedy within such high-profile events. The balance between humor and respect for those affected by serious allegations is delicate, and this year’s ceremony served as a reminder of the potential pitfalls that come with it. While Glaser’s intention may have been to entertain, the fallout from her jokes underscores the need for sensitivity, especially in a setting that celebrates the achievements and artistry of the entertainment industry.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Popular Articles